EYESPOT DEVELOPMENT ON BUTTERFLY WINGS - THE FOCAL SIGNAL

Citation
V. French et Pm. Brakefield, EYESPOT DEVELOPMENT ON BUTTERFLY WINGS - THE FOCAL SIGNAL, Developmental biology, 168(1), 1995, pp. 112-123
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Developmental Biology",Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00121606
Volume
168
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
112 - 123
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-1606(1995)168:1<112:EDOBW->2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
The eyespot colour pattern on butterfly wings is specified in the earl y pupal epidermis by signals from a central ''focus.'' In Bicyclus any nana we show that a small square of focal epidermis, grafted to a rang e of distal wing sites, induces eyespot formation in surrounding host tissue. Signaling is limited to the focus, and even an adjacent (paraf ocal) graft does not maintain its normal fate (of contributing to the eyespot) and does not influence its surroundings. Along the wing, ther e is an abrupt change in the epidermis, as a focus grafted to a proxim al site provokes no host response. The results of several grafting exp eriments demonstrate that their different response properties are auto nomous to small areas of the distal and proximal epidermis and that th e nonresponding proximal tissue can nonetheless transmit the focal sig nal. The Bicyclus dorsal forewing has a small anterior and a large pos terior eyespot, and we show that this results mainly from a difference in focal signals, not in the epidermal response. A grafted posterior focus induces a large eyespot, whereas an anterior focus induces a sma ll eyespot. Furthermore, the anterior and posterior eyespots differ in proportions, and this difference also depends on the identity of the focus, not on the responding epidermis. Eyespots are specified over ma ny cell diameters from the focus by a mechanism which could consist of one long-range signal, such as a morphogen gradient or of a cascade o f short-range interactions initiated by the focus. Focal control of th e difference in size and proportion between the anterior and posterior eyespot is more readily compatible with a gradient mechanism. Neither model, however, readily explains why the pattern induced by a grafted focus is smaller, but its peripheral gold annulus is broader than in the corresponding control eyespot. Also, there is no direct evidence f or long-range gradients, in the butterfly wing or any other insect epi thelium. (C) 1995 Academic Press,Inc.