Standard methodologies for investigating work groups are compared. Sup
plementary, complementary, and hybrid research strategies are identifi
ed and tradeoffs discussed. The need for conducting externally valid w
ork group experiments is emphasized. Methodological shortcomings in pr
evious work group experiments are cited and translated into experiment
al design guidelines which incorporate 1) realistic tasks, 2) subject
cohorts that are knowledgeable about and interested in the experimenta
l task, and 3) the organizational context provided by academic institu
tions. Together, these design guidelines constitute a previously uncha
racterized experimental methodology that increases external validity,
labeled the ''opportunistic experiment.'' Group projects undertaken by
engineering students are identified as an ideal and largely untapped
source for engineering management (and other) researchers to utilize i
n their investigations of work groups.