In a sample of British working men and women, scores on the Kirton Ada
ptation-Innovation Inventory (KAI) were compared with divergent produc
tion scores on Guilford's Consequences and Alternate Uses tests. On th
e Consequences test, adaptors and innovators produced approximately eq
ual numbers of common responses, but the innovators produced a higher
number of uncommon (remote) responses, and a higher number of response
s in total. Innovators also produced more responses than adaptors on t
he Alternate Uses test. The results are discussed with reference to th
e distinction between creative style and creative level. Creative styl
e appears to be more strongly related to some measures of creative lev
el than to others, and the results are consistent with Kirton's view t
hat when solving problems, innovators access a larger cognitive domain
than adaptors.