WORKER RESISTANCE - AN UNDERDEVELOPED CONCEPT IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF WORK

Authors
Citation
R. Hodson, WORKER RESISTANCE - AN UNDERDEVELOPED CONCEPT IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF WORK, Economic and industrial democracy, 16(1), 1995, pp. 79-110
Citations number
103
Categorie Soggetti
Industrial Relations & Labor
ISSN journal
0143831X
Volume
16
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
79 - 110
Database
ISI
SICI code
0143-831X(1995)16:1<79:WR-AUC>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Resistance, struggle and effort bargaining are important components of everyday life at the workplace. Yet the topic of worker resistance ha s been given a very limited role in our theoretical models of the work place. As a result, the study of worker resistance has remained concep tually underdeveloped. In this paper, I develop a model of worker resi stance which conceptualizes four basic agendas of resistance: deflecti ng abuse, regulating the amount and intensity of work, defending auton omy and expanding worker control through worker participation schemes. I argue that these four agendas of worker resistance parallel forms o f the organization of the labor process as characterized by Edwards (1 979) and others, with deflecting abuse being most typical of direct co ntrol, regulating the amount and intensity of work being most typical of technical control, defending autonomy being most typical of bureauc ratic control, and manipulating participation opportunities being most typical of worker resistance under modern participative organizations of work. Agendas of worker resistance, however, are not reducible to forms of the organization of control at the workplace and each agenda may emerge, to differing degrees, under any given form of labor contro l. The proposed parallelism between agendas of resistance and forms of labor control allow the development of hypotheses about both current and future developments in labor control and worker resistance.