Resistance, struggle and effort bargaining are important components of
everyday life at the workplace. Yet the topic of worker resistance ha
s been given a very limited role in our theoretical models of the work
place. As a result, the study of worker resistance has remained concep
tually underdeveloped. In this paper, I develop a model of worker resi
stance which conceptualizes four basic agendas of resistance: deflecti
ng abuse, regulating the amount and intensity of work, defending auton
omy and expanding worker control through worker participation schemes.
I argue that these four agendas of worker resistance parallel forms o
f the organization of the labor process as characterized by Edwards (1
979) and others, with deflecting abuse being most typical of direct co
ntrol, regulating the amount and intensity of work being most typical
of technical control, defending autonomy being most typical of bureauc
ratic control, and manipulating participation opportunities being most
typical of worker resistance under modern participative organizations
of work. Agendas of worker resistance, however, are not reducible to
forms of the organization of control at the workplace and each agenda
may emerge, to differing degrees, under any given form of labor contro
l. The proposed parallelism between agendas of resistance and forms of
labor control allow the development of hypotheses about both current
and future developments in labor control and worker resistance.