STUNTED GROWTH AND STEPWISE DIE-OFF IN ANIMAL COHORTS

Citation
M. Scheffer et al., STUNTED GROWTH AND STEPWISE DIE-OFF IN ANIMAL COHORTS, The American naturalist, 145(3), 1995, pp. 376-388
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00030147
Volume
145
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
376 - 388
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-0147(1995)145:3<376:SGASDI>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
A model of an animal cohort foraging on logistically growing food is a nalyzed. The problem is captured in three differential equations, one for food density and two for the state of the animal cohort, keeping t rack of body weight and number of individuals, respectively. When the animals efficiently exploit their food to low densities, the model pro duces cycles. The cycles differ markedly from those produced by tradit ional predator-prey models. Consumer decline is associated with starva tion mortality when individuals lose too much weight. This condition c auses a stepwise decline in individual number, each step corresponding to one cycle. Because the survivors of each starvation period grow an d because larger animals have lower weight-specific metabolic rates, t he nature of the cycles changes over time. They acquire a slow-fast ch aracter because of the increasing difference between food and consumer speed and show distinct catastrophic features, as the fast phases are caused by jumping between an over- and underexploited state of the fo od population, The cycles may either continue toward extinction of the cohort or damp out in a stable state characterized by stunted individ ual growth. Data from fish communities are closely in line with the sp ecific predictions from this generic model about patterns of die-off a nd stunted growth. The model behavior is robust. It does not depend on the type of functional response or the way in which mortality increas es with individual loss. Furthermore, the same patterns are obtained f rom an elaborate, realistic individual-based model, which indicates th at the results are not artifacts of simplifications like considering a ll individuals equal and assuming only one food source.