E. Schmidt et E. Krell, COSTS OF THE MODEL DEPARTMENT PASTEURIZED MARKET MILK, Kieler Milchwirtschaftliche Forschungsberichte, 48(4), 1996, pp. 293-319
The aim of the present study was to update our model calculations by a
nalysing the cost behaviour pattern in the department ''pasteurized ma
rket milk'. Compared with the cost comparison of different methods use
d for manufacturing market milk undertaken in 1975 this calculation is
based on the cost finding of a ''single-product'' simulation using th
e ''Tetra-Rex'' packing system. By considering the principle of cost a
ccounting which has been methodically further developed the production
process used for manufacturing pasteurized whole milk (3.5% fat) in 1
-I cartons was analysed in view of the costs incurred. Three different
models with filling capacities between 5.400-22.800 packages/hour, co
rresponding to a maximal production of 30.3 to 128.0 packages/year, ar
e the starting point for analysing the production costs of the departm
ent. As a function of the daily quantity filled and the production pro
gramme specific model equipments are determined, from which the variab
le and fixed inputs of the production factors can be directly derived.
The influence of different sizes- and utilization of capacity on prod
uction costs is illustrated through simulated outputs ranging between
15 and 100%. They enable the determination of costs for milk quantitie
s between 4.5 and 128.0 million packages per year. According to the re
spective capacity and the technical design of the models the investmen
ts amount to 1.7 million DM for model 1 and to 4.7 million DM for mode
l 3. Related to the respective output of the department specific inves
tments are necessary which decrease with increasing model size from 56
to 37 DM per 1.000 packs. The total costs of the department ''pasteur
ized market milk'', which are composed of the direct cost of both the
product and the division, amount to 73.8 pfennigs/pack for the largest
model in the case of a 100% output and increase with decreasing model
size and falling capacity utilization rate (15%) to 83.1 pfennigs/pac
k. As to the output-related trend in total costs there is - between th
ree- and one-shift work - a decrease in costs of 3.0 pfennigs/pack for
model 1, whilst it is 2.0 pfennigs/pack for model 3. Cost economies f
rom the largest to the smallest model as a function of capacity are 1.
7 pfennigs/pack for three-shift work and 2.7 pfennigs/pack for one-shi
ft work. As to the percentage distribution of total costs with a 64% c
apacity utilization rate raw material costs are dominant with model-sp
ecific proportions ranging between 72-73%, operating expenses account
for 25-26%, and fixed assets proportionally for 2-3%. If one describes
the percentage distribution of total costs without raw material costs
the cost types of operating costs are predominant. Under the same ini
tial conditions packing material costs account for 83-89%, personnel c
osts for 3-6%, energy costs and expenses incurred by operating supplie
s for 1-2%; here fixed assets are 7-9%. From the results of the model
calculations it can be concluded that with increasing capacity and ris
ing capacity utilization rate considerable cost economies can be achie
ved. On the other hand, it appears that cost economies as a function o
f the number of production days are minimal because of the low share o
f the per diem fixed costs in total costs.