The scanty information available on liquefaction phenomena during the
Roermond earthquake does not allow firm conclusions on the technical s
ignificance of these phenomena. However, speculations based on applied
mechanics principles justify a few conclusions on what happened and w
hat did not happen. First, the presence of fracture vents and sand boi
ls agrees well with the estimated earthquake magnitude M(L) = 5.8-5.9;
second, the rare occurrence of sand boils and the absence of visible
settlements indicate that liquefaction was not an important phenomenon
during the earthquake; third, damage of farms due to liquefaction see
ms absent. This observation is in agreement with the theoretical analy
sis of responses of the farm foundations to liquefaction. If the area
affected by liquefaction had exceeded some 1% of the total area, signi
ficant damage would have been detectable. The low ground water tables
during the time of the earthquake have most probably prevented extensi
ve damage.