L. Delrio et al., ANTEROPOSTERIOR VERSUS LATERAL BONE-MINERAL DENSITY OF SPINE ASSESSEDBY DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY, European journal of nuclear medicine, 22(5), 1995, pp. 407-412
Recently, it has been suggested that lateral (LAT) spine bone mass mea
surements by absorptiometry may be more sensitive for detecting bone l
oss than the standard anteroposterior (AP) projection. The aim of this
study was to evaluate the precision of LAT spine dual-energy X-ray ab
sorptiometry (DEXA) and its diagnostic sensitivity. A group of 1554 su
bjects with no risk factors that might affect bone metabolism and 185
osteoporotic patients with vertebral fractures were studied. Bone mine
ral density (BMD) was measured in the lumbar spine (standard AP and LA
T projections) and proximal femur with a DEXA absorptiometer. The prec
ision of the measurements was assessed in 15 volunteers. Diagnostic se
nsitivity was evaluated by the Z-score method. Comparing young people
and the elderly, spine bone loss in the latter was similar for AP and
LAT projections, when it was evaluated in absolute values (glcm(2)). H
owever, when it was evaluated in percentage terms, bone loss was about
twice as high in the LAT projection. LAT spine BMD correlated signifi
cantly with all the other ar eas assessed. The best correlation was fo
und with the standard AP projection (r=0.67, P<0.0001). The precision
in the LAT projection was found to be within an acceptable range (1.6%
in normal subjects, 2% in osteoporotic patients), even though it was
about twice that obtained in the AP projection. Diagnostic sensitivity
was also better with the AP projection. It is concluded that LAT spin
e BMD measurements can be assessed with acceptable precision although
it is about twice as high as for AP spine measurements. The percentage
decrease in BMD in the elderly is greater for measurements made in th
e LAT projection than for measurements made in the AP projection. Howe
ver, there is no enhancement of diagnostic sensitivity in osteoporosis
. BMD measurements in the LAT projection are not as good as in the AP
projection but they may offer complementary information of the regiona
l evolution of spine bone mass.