THE LIMITED VALUE OF HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY IN ASSESSING TUBAL STATUS AND FERTILITY POTENTIAL

Citation
Vc. Karande et al., THE LIMITED VALUE OF HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY IN ASSESSING TUBAL STATUS AND FERTILITY POTENTIAL, Fertility and sterility, 63(6), 1995, pp. 1167-1171
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00150282
Volume
63
Issue
6
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1167 - 1171
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(1995)63:6<1167:TLVOHI>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Design: To determine whether the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic va lue of hysterosalpingography (HSG) could be improved if routine spot f ilms were replaced by an on-line recorded gynecoradiologic study. Sett ing: Medical school-affiliated private infertility center. Patients: I n 1992, a review of 152 infertile women with infertility who demonstra ted a normal HSG, by standard criteria of spot film evaluation, in 117 (77%). They were further investigated by gynecoradiologic study if th e HSG revealed asymmetrical tubal filling, an increased perfusion pres sure, and/or evidence for abnormal tubal spill. In 1993, 47 women with normal HSG by spot film criteria underwent bilateral selective salpin gography and were subdivided into those with normal (group I, n = 23) and abnormal (group II, n = 24) tubal perfusion pressures. Interventio n: Patients in both study groups then were treated for their infertili ty independently of pressure perfusion measurements. Main Outcome Meas ure: Clinical pregnancy rates (PRs) over the ensuing 6 to 10 months. R esults: Among 117 women with apparently normal spot film HSG, 64 (55%) demonstrated asymmetrical tubal filling, 32 (27%) demonstrated abnorm al spillage into the peritoneal cavity, and 55 (47%) demonstrated abno rmally elevated injection pressures. Among 98 women who underwent bila teral selective salpingography, 43 (44%) demonstrated bilaterally norm al tubal perfusion pressures and 55 (56%) showed an abnormally elevate d pressure in at least one oviduct. Of 47 women that were followed pro spectively in 1993, patients with normal perfusion pressure (group I) demonstrated a significantly higher PR than women with elevated tubal pressure (group II) from 2 months and on after the procedure. Conclusi ons: Routine spot film HSG is of limited value in assessing tubal stat us beyond the determination of tubal patency. Especially with regard t o fertility potential, HSG should be replaced by gynecoradiologic stud y.