Jm. Townsend et al., LOW-INVESTMENT COPULATION - SEX-DIFFERENCES IN MOTIVATIONS AND EMOTIONAL-REACTIONS, Ethology and sociobiology, 16(1), 1995, pp. 25-51
Samples of male (n = 113) and female (n = 175) college students were s
urveyed. Majorities of both sexes agreed with statements indicating th
at males' sexual 'attractiveness varied more than females' sexual attr
activeness as a function of their status. Subjects who reported more s
ex partners and a greater aversion to sexual monogamy were slightly mo
re likely to agree that they tested their partners to see how far they
could push them. Interviews with highly sexually active females (n =
32) and males (n = 24) indicated that low-investment copulation and la
ck of control over the sexual access-investment ratio caused even wome
n with very permissive attitudes and multiple sex partners to develop
an aversion to low-investment copulation. Three levels were identified
in this process. The techniques that women with multiple partners use
d to deal with their feelings are described. Females tested their part
ners for ability and willingness io invest. Males tested for opportuni
ties to reduce investment and pursue other women. High status, for exa
mple athletic stardom, transformed males' sexual attractiveness to wom
en and numbers of sex partners. Results were consistent with the view
that the emotional-motivational mechanisms that moderate sexual arousa
l and attraction are sexually dimorphic.