Mh. Naess et K. Malterud, PATIENTS STORIES - SCIENCE, CLINICAL FACTS OR FAIRY-TALES, Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 13(1), 1995, pp. 59-64
Objective - To explore potentials and attributes of the qualitative re
search interview as a tool for acquiring knowledge about illness. Desi
gn - A qualitative approach, comparing knowledge about consultations o
riginating from 1) data from interviews with immigrant female patients
, and 2) evaluative data from registration forms from the doctors. Set
ting and Subjects - 24 Pakistani female patients, recruited from the a
ppointment list at a primary health care centre in central Oslo were i
nterviewed in their homes. Evaluation forms were filled in by the ten
physicians consulted.Main outcome measures - Illness knowledge derived
from different communicative contexts. Contextual prerequisites sugge
st potential roads to the inquiry of illness applicable in the clinica
l context. Case stories - Patients' illness perspectives and resources
were probably encouraged in the interview by means of discourse under
lining the women's resources. This position may have emerged because t
he women were actually consulted by the interviewer. Dialogues activel
y seeking out the other person's illness perspective, as recommended i
n the qualitative interview, seem to encourage adequate exchange of me
dical information. Conclusion/Implications - Pursuing and modifying st
rategies from the qualitative interview for exploration of illness may
contribute to clinical facts as well as scientific knowledge concerni
ng illness.