A PHASE-II TRIAL INVESTIGATING PRIMARY IMMUNOCHEMOTHERAPY FOR MALIGNANT PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA AND THE FEASIBILITY OF ADJUVANT IMMUNOCHEMOTHERAPY AFTER MAXIMAL CYTOREDUCTION

Citation
Hw. Pass et al., A PHASE-II TRIAL INVESTIGATING PRIMARY IMMUNOCHEMOTHERAPY FOR MALIGNANT PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA AND THE FEASIBILITY OF ADJUVANT IMMUNOCHEMOTHERAPY AFTER MAXIMAL CYTOREDUCTION, Annals of surgical oncology, 2(3), 1995, pp. 214-220
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Oncology
Journal title
ISSN journal
10689265
Volume
2
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
214 - 220
Database
ISI
SICI code
1068-9265(1995)2:3<214:APTIPI>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Background: The treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) cont inues to be inadequate with the use of standard techniques, including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We initiated a phase II trial of immunochemotherapy with cisplatinum (25 mg/m(2) four times weekly), interferon-alpha (5 mU/m(2) s.c. three times weekly, and tamoxifen (2 0 mg orally twice a day for 35 days) (CIT) based on in vitro and in vi vo data suggesting interrelating efficacy of this combination. Methods : Since July 1991, 36 patients have been evaluable for response after receiving one to five cycles of CIT. Ten additional patients had debul king surgery followed by two cycles of postoperative adjuvant CIT comm encing a mean of 6 weeks after surgery. Results: Toxicity was acceptab le (4% grade III/IV). One treatment-related death (2%) occurred, from myocardial infarction. A 19% partial response rate, objectively quanti fied using three-dimensional computerized tomographic (CT) measurement of solid disease volume, was recorded. The median survival for the se ven responders was 14.7 months, whereas that of the nonresponders was 8 months (p2 = 0.2), Median survival for the entire group was 8.7 mont hs. Preoperative size, platelet count > 360,000/ml, and nonepithelial histology were associated with shortened survival. Conclusions: The CI T regimen has some activity in MPM and can be delivered after debulkin g resection. In good-risk patients, as defined by favorable prognostic factors, a randomized trial using this combination may be warranted.