Dm. Lin et al., COMPARISON OF 3 TYPING METHODS FOR CLINICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISOLATES OF ASPERGILLUS-FUMIGATUS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 33(6), 1995, pp. 1596-1601
To evaluate procedures used for epidemiologic analysis of outbreaks of
aspergillosis, we analyzed a collection of 35 Aspergillus fumigatus i
solates using three typing methods: isoenzyme analysis (IEA), random a
mplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, and restriction endonuclease
analysis (REA). Twenty-one isolates were from a single hospital, with
four isolates coming from different patients. Three clinical isolates
came from a different hospital, and 11 clinical or environmental isol
ates were derived from a culture collection. With IEA, the patterns of
alkaline phosphatase, esterase, and catalase discriminated nine types
. In contrast, 22 types were obtained with five different RAPD primers
, and 21 types could be detected with three of these (R108, R151, and
UBC90). Restriction endonuclease analysis of genomic DNA, digested wit
h either XbaI, XhoI, or SalI, detected 3, 17, and 13 different REA typ
es, respectively, and 22 types were identified by combining the data f
rom the XhoI and SalI REAs. Twenty-eight types were obtainable with a
combination of REA, IEA, and RAPD patterns. Overall, the results point
ed to substantial genetic variation among the isolates. Though two iso
lates had markedly distinct genotypes, their morphologic features and
exoantigens were consistent with their being A. fumigatus. The analysi
s will help in planning epidemiologic studies of aspergillosis.