Ro. Uusitalo et al., GRADED RESPONSES AND SPIKING PROPERTIES OF IDENTIFIED FIRST-ORDER VISUAL INTERNEURONS OF THE FLY COMPOUND EYE, Journal of neurophysiology, 73(5), 1995, pp. 1782-1792
1. We studied the graded and spiking properties of the ''non-spiking''
first-order visual interneurons of the fly compound eye in situ with
the use of intracellular recordings. Iontophoretical QX-314 injections
, Lucifer yellow marking, and (discontinuous) current-clamp method tog
ether with transfer function analysis were used to characterize the ne
ural signal processing mechanisms in these neurons. 2. A light-OFF Spi
ke was seen in one identified anatomic subtype (L(3), n = 6) of the th
ree first-order visual interneurons (L(1), L(2), and L(3), or LMCs) wh
en recorded from synaptic region (i.e., in the 1st visual ganglion, la
mina ganglionaris) in dark-adapted conditions. Hyperpolarization of th
e membrane potential by current caused the identified L(1) (n = 4), as
well as L(3) (n = 6), to produce an OFF spike, a number of action pot
entials, and some subthreshold depolarizations after the light-ON resp
onse. In L(2) the OFF spike or action potentials could not be elicited
. 3. To produce action potentials in L(1) and L(3), it was found to be
necessary to hyperpolarize the cells similar to 35-45 mV (n = 43) bel
ow the resting potential (RP) in the synaptic zone. Recordings from th
e axons of these cells revealed that near the second neuropil (chiasma
) the threshold of these spikes was near to (similar to 10 mV below, n
= 16) or even at the RP when an ON spike was also produced (n = 4). 4
. The recorded spikes were up to 54 mV in amplitude, appeared with a m
aximum frequency of up to 120 impulses/s, and had a duration of simila
r to 8 ms. In L(1) and L(3) the spikes were elicited either after a li
ght pulse (L(3)) Or after a negative current step that was superimpose
d on a hyperpolarizing steady-state current (L(3) and L(1)). A positiv
e current step (similarly superimposed on a hyperpolarizing steady-sta
te current) also triggered the spikes during the step. 5. Iontophoreti
c injection of a potent intracellularly effective blocker of voltage-g
ated sodium channels, QX-314, irreversibly eradicated the spikes and s
ubthreshold depolarizations (n = 5). In addition, further injections e
longated the light-on responses and decreased or even abolished the Li
ght-OFF response.6. Negative prepulses followed by positive current st
eps were applied from the RP, to test the activation-inactivation prop
erties of the channels responsible for the OFF spike. During this expe
riment the increase of the negative prepulse (removal of the inactivat
ion) increased the amplitude of the OFF spike from 7 to 21 mV, whereas
the increase of the positive test pulse (activation test) led to the
increase of the spike from 5 to 51 mV. 7. These results indicate that
voltage-gated sodium channels that are normally highly inactivated are
responsible for the OFF-spike generation in L(3) and L(1), and that p
robably a component of the light-OFF response is mediated via the same
conductance as well. The fact that L(2) did not show any spiking prop
erties suggests that this subtype is responsible of feeding visual inf
ormation to a different functional subsystem than L(1) or L(3) 8. Freq
uency domain analysis suggested that the putative sodium channels in L
MC axons considerably increase the gain of the signals at high frequen
cies and produce a resonance. Thus in these neurons the OFF spike is p
robably used to compensate the gain loss and to improve the signal-to-
noise ratio (SNR) during the passive propagation through the long and
thin axon. All three interneurons therefore regulate the gain in diffe
rent manner and could be considered as parallel pathways with differen
tly modulated responses.