Mf. Walker et al., NEURONS IN THE MONKEY SUPERIOR COLLICULUS PREDICT THE VISUAL RESULT OF IMPENDING SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS, Journal of neurophysiology, 73(5), 1995, pp. 1988-2003
1. Previous experiments have shown that visual neurons in the lateral
intraparietal area (LIP) respond predictively to stimuli outside their
classical receptive fields when an impending saccade will bring those
stimuli into their receptive fields. Because LIP projects strongly to
the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus, we sought to demo
nstrate similar predictive responses in the monkey colliculus. 2. We s
tudied the behavior of 90 visually responsive neurons in the superfici
al and intermediate layers of the superior colliculus of two rhesus mo
nkeys (Macaca mulatta) when visual stimuli or the locations of remembe
red stimuli were brought into their receptive fields by a saccade. 3.
Thirty percent (18/60) of intermediate layer visuomovement cells respo
nded predictively before a saccade outside the movement field of the n
euron when that saccade would bring the location of a stimulus into th
e receptive field. Each of these neurons did not respond to the stimul
us unless an eye movement brought it into its receptive field, nor did
it discharge in association with the eye movement unless it brought a
stimulus into its receptive field. 4. These neurons were located in t
he deeper parts of the intermediate layers and had relatively larger r
eceptive fields and movement fields than the cells at the top of the i
ntermediate layers. 5. The predictive responses of most of these neuro
ns (16/18, 89%) did not require that the stimulus be relevant to the m
onkey's rewarded behavior. However, for some neurons the predictive re
sponse was enhanced when the stimulus was the target of a subsequent s
accade into the neuron's movement field. 6. Most neurons with predicti
ve responses responded with a similar magnitude and latency to a conti
nuous stimulus that remained on after the saccade, and to the same sti
mulus when it was only flashed for 50 ms coincident with the onset of
the saccade target and thus never appeared within the cell's classical
receptive field. 7. The visual response of neurons in the intermediat
e layers of the colliculus is suppressed during the saccade itself. Ne
urons that showed predictive responses began to discharge before the s
accade, were suppressed during the saccade, and usually resumed discha
rging after the saccade. 8. Three neurons in the intermediate layers r
esponded tonically from stimulus appearance to saccade without a presa
ccadic burst. These neurons responded predictively to a stimulus that
was going to be the target for a second saccade, but not to an irrelev
ant flashed stimulus. 9. No superficial layer neuron (0/27) responded
predictively when a stimulus would be brought into their receptive fie
lds by a saccade. This suggests that such responses will also not be f
ound in the retina and striate and early prestriate visual cortex, whi
ch are the major sources of visual input to these layers. 10. For both
superficial and intermediate layer neurons, the response to a stimulu
s flashed in the receptive field was stronger than the response of the
neuron to the same stimulus brought into the receptive held by an eye
movement (the reafferent response). 11. We suggest that the predictiv
e response is caused by a transient shift in the retinal receptive fie
ld of the neuron, effected by a neural discharge corollary to the impe
nding saccade. This mechanism enables the visual input to the saccadic
system to compensate for eye movements and maintain a spatially accur
ate retinotopic representation of the visual world.