Intuition tells us that the optimal penalty and court care to avoid er
ror should rise smoothly with the harm to the victim. This is not alwa
ys correct; sometimes the optimal penalty and level of court care incr
ease discontinuously with harm, even when penalties deter harm and cou
rt care reduces error continuously. This is shown in a model in which
the social cost of crime consists of its direct harm, the cost of cour
t care, and the cost of false convictions.