LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP AFTER PRIMARY REPAIR OF 20 ISOLATED FLEXOR POLLICIS LONGUS TENDON LACERATIONS

Citation
H. Thomazeau et al., LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP AFTER PRIMARY REPAIR OF 20 ISOLATED FLEXOR POLLICIS LONGUS TENDON LACERATIONS, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur, 82(7), 1996, pp. 590-597
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Orthopedics
ISSN journal
00351040
Volume
82
Issue
7
Year of publication
1996
Pages
590 - 597
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-1040(1996)82:7<590:LFAPRO>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Purpose of the study This study was performed to assess the long term functional result oi Flexor Pollicis Longus tendon repair, with a spec ial interest to the influence of associated neurovascular damages. sur gical procedures and rehabilitation techniques. Material 20 out 30 pat ients operated between 1979 and 1994 returned for follow-up (average 5 .3 years), The 10 patients lost for follow-up presented no significant epidemiological difference. The location of the laceration was classi fied according to the International Federation of Hand Surgery Societi es (10 T1, 6 T2, 1 T3, 2 T4, T5), and a 3 staged classification of neu rovascular bundles damage was used. Methods A quantitative evaluation of the active range of motion (extension and flexion) of the interphal angeal joint (IP) was used and allowed calculation of the Tubiana's ra ting score, The pollici-digital key-pinch was assessed both qualitativ ely and quantitatively. All the data were compared with the opposite t humb. Results 85 per cent of patients had excellent or good results ac cording to Tubiana's rating score. The mean flexion of the IP joint wa s 49.7 degrees (64 per cent of the apposite side), and the key-pinch s trength was 69 per cent of its contralateral value. On the opposite, t he mean extension was 0.75 degrees and 3 patients complained about poo r quality of their lateral key-pinch. Discussion A quantitative evalua tion is more meaningfull than a global rating core, especially for IP joint lack of extension, and could lead to underestimate the actual pa tient discomfort, Despite the absence of statistical relevance, lacera tions of the 2 neurovascular bundles (stage III) seem to impair the fi nal result. We have found no difference between different types uf ten don sutures, A protected post-operative passive rehabilition seemed to Improve both motion and strength of the operated thumb. Conclusion Th ere is no more discussion about the need to repair in emergency all th e damaged structures of the thumb. We recommend wrist tendon lengtheni ng when a pull-out suture is used, and when there is an impingement be tween suture and pulleys in T2 zone. We prefer a controlled-passive re habilitation.