'Scientific discourse is entirely suffused with ordinary language, wit
h terms that bring with them all varieties of the imprecision scientis
ts seek to avoid. More distressing yet, even technical terms turn out,
far more often than we had hoped, to be plagued by the unruliness of
ordinary language. By virtue of their dependence on ordinary language
counterparts, techical terms carry, along with their ties to the natur
al world of inanimate and animate objects, indissoluble ties to the so
cial world of ordinary language speakers. In this way, even carefully
delineated technical terms are bedeviled by semantic shadows that insi
stently blur their borders.'