J. Broeckhove et al., ON THE DEFINITION OF NONADIABATIC EFFECTS IN CURVE-CROSSING PROBLEMS, International journal of quantum chemistry, 55(1), 1995, pp. 3-8
When two electronic potentials present an avoided crossing, the adiaba
tic approximation breaks down in the energy region near to the crossin
g. In particular, the correspondence between exact energy levels of th
e two-state system and the adiabatic levels of the lower and upper adi
abatic potentials becomes ambiguous. This implies that the term ''nona
diabatic effect,'' used for the difference between exact and adiabatic
energy eigenvalues, loses its meaning in the crossing regime unless a
n unambiguous way of assigning an adiabatic to an exact level is defin
ed. This is important in order to investigate where nonadiabatic schem
es, such as the generator coordinate approximation, fit in between the
adiabatic approximation and quasi-exact approaches. (C) 1995 John Wil
ey and Sons.