Rc. Klesges et al., WHO UNDERREPORTS DIETARY-INTAKE IN A DIETARY RECALL - EVIDENCE FROM THE 2ND NATIONAL-HEALTH AND NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 63(3), 1995, pp. 438-444
The present study sought to identify the presence and degree of appare
nt underreporting of dietary intake in 11,663 participants in the Seco
nd National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II). Self-
reported dietary intake was compared with estimated basal metabolic ra
te. Underreporting was based on cutoff limits that identified plausibl
e levels bf energy expenditure for adult individuals. Results indicate
d that up to 31% of adults in this sample may have underreported dieta
ry intake. Those individuals at greatest risk of underreporting were l
ess well educated and heavier. The Sex X Race interaction indicated th
at for both ethnic categories, women were more likely to underreport t
han men, but the difference between men and women was greater among Ca
ucasian participants. It is concluded that such factors as reduced ene
rgy needs, deliberate falsification, and measurement error inherent in
dietary assessment contribute to apparent underreporting, and this oc
curs in a large percentage of dietary data.