In every known human society, some kind--usually many kinds--of art is
practiced, frequently with much vigor and pleasure, so that one could
at least hypothesize that ''artifying'' or ''artification'' is a char
acteristic behavior of our species. Yet human ethologists and sociobio
logists have been conspicuously unforthcoming about this observably wi
despread and valued practice, for a number of stated and unstated reas
ons. The present essay is a position paper that offers an overview and
analysis of conceptual issues and problems inherent in viewing art an
d/or aesthetics as adaptive, and it presents a speculative account of
a human behavior of art.