J. Sawynok et al., CAFFEINE ANTINOCICEPTION IN THE RAT HOT-PLATE AND FORMALIN TESTS AND LOCOMOTOR STIMULATION - INVOLVEMENT OF NORADRENERGIC MECHANISMS, Pain, 61(2), 1995, pp. 203-213
The present study examined antinociception produced by systemic admini
stration of caffeine in the rat hot-plate (HP) and formalin tests and
addressed several aspects of the mechanism of action of caffeine. Loco
motor activity was monitored throughout. Caffeine produced a dose-rela
ted antinociception the HP (50-100 mg/kg) and formalin tests (12.5-75
mg/kg). When observed during the formalin test, caffeine stimulated lo
comotor activity between 12.5 and 50 mg/kg; this was followed by a dep
ression in activity at 75 mg/kg. Caffeine did not produce an anti-infl
ammatory effect as determined by hindpaw plethysmometry, suggesting th
at antinociception was not secondary to an anti-inflammatory action. P
eripheral co-administration of caffeine with the formalin did not prod
uce antinociception, suggesting a predominant central rather than peri
pheral site of action for caffeine. Naloxone (10 mg/kg) did not reduce
the antinociceptive or locomotor stimulant effects of caffeine, sugge
sting a lack of involvement of endogenous opioids in these actions. Ph
entolamine (5 mg/kg) enhanced antinociception by caffeine in both the
HP and formalin tests, but inhibited locomotor stimulation. Prazosin (
0.15 mg/kg) mimicked the action of phentolamine on locomotor stimulati
on, but idazoxan (0.5 mg/kg) mimicked the action of phentolamine on an
tinociception in the formalin test. These observations suggest an invo
lvement of different alpha-adrenergic receptors in the two actions of
phentolamine. Microinjection of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into the lo
cus coeruleus, which depleted noradrenaline (NA) in the spinal cord an
d forebrain, inhibited the action of caffeine in the HP test. This was
mimicked by intrathecal 6-OHDA which depleted NA in the spinal cord,
but not by microinjection of 6-OHDA into the dorsal bundle which deple
ted NA in the forebrain. These results suggest an integral involvement
of noradrenergic mechanisms in the antinociceptive action of caffeine
in the HP and formalin tests and in locomotor stimulation, but the na
ture of this involvement differs for the 3 end points.