We have tested the effect of a porous cellulose fabric face mask. Nine
asthmatic patients, anamnestically sensitive to cold, took part in ex
ercise tests on an ergometer bicycle at a temperature of approximately
-10 degrees C, with and without a face mask. For comparison, exercise
tests were also performed with breathing taking place through a woole
n scarf. Three minutes after finishing the exercise test, there was an
average fall in FEV(1) of 32% in the group without a face mask. The c
orresponding fall in FEV(1) was 6% with a face mask and 17% with a sca
rf. In order to get some idea of the patients' attitudes to the face m
ask, it was used by 25 asthma patients during a period of 2 weeks in w
inter, after which they were asked to answer a simple questionnaire. E
ighty-eight percent of the patients stated that the face mask had prov
ided satisfactory protection against asthma complaints induced by cold
air, and 72% reported that they had been able to spend more time out-
of-doors. The results show that porous cellulose fabric designed as a
face mask offers effective protection against asthma complaints induce
d by cold air and exercise, and that the patients appear to appreciate
this protective aid highly despite the cosmetic disadvantages.