Gj. Dinant et al., DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF C-REACTIVE PROTEIN MEASUREMENT DOES NOT JUSTIFY REPLACEMENT OF THE ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION-RATE IN DAILY GENERAL-PRACTICE, European journal of clinical investigation, 25(5), 1995, pp. 353-359
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, Research & Experimental","Medicine, General & Internal
The purpose of this paper was to establish the diagnostic value of the
C-reactive protein measurement (CRP) in patients attending their gene
ral practitioner (GP) with a new complaint for which the GP considers
determination of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) to be indica
ted. During 4 successive months in 1992, 11 GPs in four general practi
ce centres in the Netherlands identified patients indicated for the er
ythrocyte sedimentation rate. ESR and CRP were determined at the local
hospital laboratory. One year later, an independent GP established th
e follow-up diagnoses. By comparing the test results with the follow-u
p diagnoses, using logistic regression analysis and Receiver Operating
Characteristic curves, sensitivities, specificities, predictive value
s and odds ratios were established. In 396 patients the prevalence of
inflammatory diseases and malignancies ('pathology') was found to be 2
6% in males and 15% in females. Both ESR and CRP were valuable in disc
riminating pathology from harmless, often self-limiting diseases. The
optimal upper limits of reference values ('cut-off points') for ESR we
re found to be 31 mm in both males and females. At these cut-off point
s, the diagnostic gains from positive and negative test results (posit
ive predictive value minus prevalence, and negative predictive value m
inus 100% minus prevalence) were 45% and 4% for males and 30% and 2% f
or females. The optimal cut-off point for CRP was found at 15 mg L(-1)
in males and 34 mg L(-1) in females. The diagnostic gain from positiv
e and negative test results were 18% and 9% in males and 25% and 4% in
females. In daily general practice there is no reason to abandon ESR
in favour of CRP. Only if a GP wants to be informed of the test result
as quickly as possible, and the costs of ordering tests are less impo
rtant, might CRP be reconsidered as a test.