LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP TO DETERMINE THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF IMAGING AFTER URINARY-TRACT INFECTIONS .2. SCARRING

Citation
Mv. Merrick et al., LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP TO DETERMINE THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF IMAGING AFTER URINARY-TRACT INFECTIONS .2. SCARRING, Archives of Disease in Childhood, 72(5), 1995, pp. 393-396
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
ISSN journal
00039888
Volume
72
Issue
5
Year of publication
1995
Pages
393 - 396
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9888(1995)72:5<393:LFTDTP>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Long term follow up of children with urinary tract infections, in whom imaging investigations were performed at presentation, has been used to identify features that distinguish those at greatest risk of progre ssive renal damage. No single investigation at presentation was able t o predict subsequent deterioration but, by employing a combination of imaging investigations, it was possible to separate groups with high o r low probability of progressive damage. In the low risk group the inc idence of progressive damage was 0.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0 to 1.3%). The combination of both scarring and reflux at presentation, or one only of these but accompanied by subsequent documented urinary tract infection, was associated with a 17-fold (95% CI 2.5 to 118) in crease in the relative risk of progressive renal damage compared with children without these features. The recommended combination of invest igations at presentation for girls of any age and boys over 1 year is ultrasound and dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy in all, to detect both scarring and significant structural abnormalities, renogra phy in children with dilatation of any part of the urinary tract on ul trasound, to distinguish dilatation from obstruction, and an isotope v oiding study in all who have acquired bladder control. This gives the best separation between those at high and those at low risk of progres sive damage with least radiation dose and lowest rate of instrumentati on. Micturating cystourethrography (MCU) should be restricted to girls who have not acquired bladder control, unless there is reason to susp ect a significant structural abnormality such as urethral valves. A si ngle non-febrile urinary tract infection that responds promptly to tre atment is not a justification for performing MCU in boys under 1 year or in children of any age with bladder control. No case can be made fo r any abbreviated schedule of investigation. These risk factors should be taken into account when designing follow up protocols.