Interpretations go beyond assigning unconscious meaning to analytic ma
terial. They inevitably communicate the analyst's assessments of the p
atient's present and past conflicts, and his expectations for their fu
ture resolution. The analyst's estimation of a patient's potential, as
well as his personal investment in helping the patient realize that p
otential, is embedded in the interpretive process. Although careful an
alysis of unintended interpretive influences on a patient's transferen
ce and resistance is required to assure relative neutrality, there rem
ains a residual conditioning effect of interpretations that catalyzes
the analytic process and reinforces a patient's efforts to change.