Am. Handler et Sp. Gomez, THE HOBO TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENT HAS TRANSPOSASE-DEPENDENT AND TRANSPOSASE-INDEPENDENT EXCISION ACTIVITY IN DROSOPHILID SPECIES, MGG. Molecular & general genetics, 247(4), 1995, pp. 399-408
Mobility of the hobo transposable element was determined for several s
trains of Drosophila melanogaster and several Drosophila species. Mobi
lity was assessed by use of an in vivo transient assay in the soma of
developing embryos, which monitored hobo excision from injected indica
tor plasmids. Excision was detected in a D. melanogaster strain (cn; r
y(42)) devoid of endogenous hobo elements only after co-injection of a
helper plasmid containing functional hobo transposase under either he
at shock or normal promoter regulation. Excision was also detected in
D. melanogaster without helper in strains known to contain genomic cop
ies of hobo. In Drosophila species confirmed not to contain hobo, hobo
excision occurred at significant rates both in the presence and absen
ce of co-injected helper plasmid. In four of the seven species tested,
excision frequencies were two- to fivefold lower in the presence of p
lasmid-borne hobo, hobo excision donor sites were sequenced in indicat
or plasmids extracted from D. melanogaster ry(42) and D. virilis embry
os. In the presence of hobo transposase, the predominant excision site
s were identical in both species, having breakpoints at the hobo termi
ni with an inverted duplication of proximal insertion site DNA. Howeve
r, in the absence of hobo transposase in D. virilis, excision breakpoi
nts were apparently random and occurred distal to the hobo termini. Th
e data indicate that hobo is capable of functioning in the soma during
embryogenesis, and that its mobility is unrestricted in drosophilids.
Furthermore, drosophilids not containing hobo are able to mobilize ho
bo, presumably by a hobo-related cross-mobilizing system. The cross-mo
bilizing system in D. virilis is not functionally identical to hobo wi
th respect to excision sequence specificity.