Mh. Raitt et al., CLINICAL PREDICTORS OF THE DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD WITH THE UNIPOLARIMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATION SYSTEM, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(7), 1995, pp. 1576-1583
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the relation be
tween clinical variables and the defibrillation threshold by using a s
tandardized testing protocol and a uniform implantable defibrillator s
ystem. Background. Past studies have not revealed useful correlations
between clinical variables and the energy required to terminate ventri
cular fibrillation. Most of these studies did not use a uniform implan
table defibrillator system or a standardized protocol to measure the d
efibrillation threshold and, thus, did not control for the influence o
f these technical influences. We postulated that defibrillator and def
ibrillation threshold measurement-based sources of variability oversha
dowed important clinical predictors. Methods. The defibrillation thres
hold was measured by using a standardized protocol in 101 consecutive
patients. We used a transvenous unipolar pectoral defibrillation syste
m that employed a single endocardial right ventricular defibrillation
coil as the anode and the shell of an 80-cm(3) pulse generator as the
cathode to deliver a 65% tilt biphasic pulse. Results. Several clinica
l variables were found to be significantly associated with the defibri
llation threshold: patient gender, height, weight, body surface area,
heart rate at rest, QRS and corrected QT (QTc) intervals, left ventric
ular mass and several measures of heart and chest size by chest roentg
enogram. None of these variables had a correlation coefficient >0.45 w
ith the defibrillation threshold. On multivariate analysis, left ventr
icular mass and heart rate at rest were the only independent predictor
s of the defibrillation threshold and explained only 25% of the observ
ed variability. Conclusions. Despite the use of a uniform transvenous
defibrillation system and a standardized protocol to measure the defib
rillation threshold, no clinically relevant correlation was found betw
een clinical variables and the defibrillation threshold. The defibrill
ation threshold is probably a function of a complex interaction of ana
tomic, physiologic and cellular variables that are not adequately repr
esented by easily obtainable clinical information. It is probably not
possible to predict defibrillation outcome from standard clinical vari
ables.