De. Montano et Wr. Phillips, CANCER SCREENING BY PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS - A COMPARISON OF RATES OBTAINED FROM PHYSICIAN SELF-REPORT, PATIENT SURVEY, AND CHART AUDIT, American journal of public health, 85(6), 1995, pp. 795-800
Objectives. This study measured the cancer screening rates of family p
hysicians and compared the measures obtained through physician self-re
ports, chart audits, and patient surveys. Methods. A cancer screening
survey was sent to 50% of the members of the Washington Academy of Fam
ily Physicians, with 326 family physicians (74% response rate) complet
ing the survey. Sixty physicians were recruited for the patient survey
and chart audit phase, with a 90% participation rate. Patient surveys
were conducted with about 350 patients per physician, and chart audit
s were conducted on a subset of about 50 patients per physician. Each
physician's rate of providing each service was computed from the self-
report, the patient survey, and the chart audit. Results. Physicians p
rovided many of these services at rates different from those commonly
recommended. Large discrepancies were found between the rates measured
by different methods. Correlations between rates derived from chart a
udits and patient surveys were high; however, correlations between rat
es from physician self-report and either patient survey or chart audit
were much lower for all services. Conclusions. Studies of physicians'
provision of cancer prevention services should not rely on physician
self-report, but should obtain the rates through patient surveys or ch
art audits.