AUTOMATED AND ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF THE DISTRIBUTION, MAGNITUDE, ANDDIRECTION OF PINCUSHION DISTORTION IN ANGIOGRAPHIC IMAGES

Citation
Pmj. Vanderzwet et al., AUTOMATED AND ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF THE DISTRIBUTION, MAGNITUDE, ANDDIRECTION OF PINCUSHION DISTORTION IN ANGIOGRAPHIC IMAGES, Investigative radiology, 30(4), 1995, pp. 204-213
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
00209996
Volume
30
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
204 - 213
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-9996(1995)30:4<204:AAAAOT>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. Pincushion distortion continues to be a pote ntial problem for the accurate assessment of arterial and catheter dim ensions from x-ray angiograms. The authors investigate whether the dis tortion of state-of-the-art intensifiers is yet small enough to be neg lected, and whether the rotation/angulation of the x-ray system plays a significant role. METHODS. The location and degree of distortion fro m x-ray images of a centimeter grid, which is positioned against the i nput screen of the image intensifier, are assessed automatically using image processing techniques. A value for the maximum amount of change in the distortion vector field is derived that allows the estimation of the maximum relative error associated with a diameter measurement u ncorrected for pincushion distortion. RESULTS. The accuracy of the alg orithm itself was assessed by rotating and translating the centimeter grid under the image intensifier at anteroposterior position. For the distortion vector length, the standard deviation in the measurement of the distortion areas was found to be 3.7 cm(2) (1.3% of the total are a). For the gradient values, the standard deviation was 2.2 cm(2) or 0 .75% of the total image intensifier area. In the second evaluation stu dy, the centimeter grid was fixed onto the input screen of the image i ntensifier, and the gantry was rotated to span all possible positions of the system. In this case, the changes in measured areas were often much larger (up to 51.25 cm(2) for a 9-inch image intensifier, equival ent to 15.6% of the total image intensifier area) than the standard de viations that had been found in the first evaluation study. CONCLUSION S. The distortion is highly dependent upon the actual spatial position of the image intensifier, and correcting for pincushion distortion ma y therefore introduce larger errors than leaving the measurements unco rrected.