COMPARISON OF STRESS-BASED AND STRAIN-BASED CREEP FAILURE CRITERIA FOR SEVERE ACCIDENT ANALYSIS

Citation
Sa. Chavez et al., COMPARISON OF STRESS-BASED AND STRAIN-BASED CREEP FAILURE CRITERIA FOR SEVERE ACCIDENT ANALYSIS, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 155(3), 1995, pp. 603-622
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Nuclear Sciences & Tecnology
ISSN journal
00295493
Volume
155
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
603 - 622
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-5493(1995)155:3<603:COSASC>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
We conducted a parametic analysis of stress-based and strain-based cre ep failure criteria to determine if there is a significant difference between the two criteria for SA533B vessel steel under severe accident conditions. Parametric variables include debris composition, system p ressure, and creep strain histories derived from different testing pro grams and mathematically fit, with and without tertiary creep. Results indicate significant differences between the two criteria. Stress gra dient plays an important role in determining which criterion will pred ict failure first. Creep failure was not very sensitive to different c reep strain histories, except near the transition temperature of the v essel steel (900 K to 1000 K). Statistical analyses of creep failure d ata of four independent sources indicate that these data may be pooled , with a spline point at 1000 K. We found the Manson-Haferd parameter to have better failure predictive capability than the Larson-Miller pa rameter for the data studied.