R. Altstidl et al., POSTSTENOTIC AND POSTSTENOTIC FLOW MEASUREMENT TO ASSESS SEVERITY OF CORONARY-ARTERY STENOSIS, Vascular surgery, 29(3), 1995, pp. 189-197
The purpose of this study was to investigate differences between prest
enotic and post; stenotic intracoronary Doppler flow velocities and to
determine whether these hemodynamic parameters of coronary flow demon
strate a correlation with geometrically measured coronary artery steno
sis. A low-profile (0.018-in.) Doppler angioplasty guidewire capable o
f providing spectral flow velocity data was used to measure blood flow
velocities both proximal and distal of 95 coronary artery stenoses ra
nging from 15% to 82% in diameter:Percent diameter stenoses were analy
zed by quantitative coronary arteriography. In comparison with presten
otic measurements poststenotic Doppler flow velocities were markedly r
educed in coronary artery stenoses with a diameter reduction greater t
han 50% in quantitative angiography. In stenoses less than 50% nb diff
erence between prestenotic and poststenotic parameters of coronary flo
w could be found. Prestenotic Doppler data demonstrated no correlation
to percent diameter stenosis, whereas poststenotic flow data correlat
ed moderately with percent diameter stenosis. Poststenotic Doppler dat
a of stenoses below 50% differed significantly from stenoses above 50%
. In conclusion, intracoronary Doppler flow velocity measurements perf
ormed distal to coronary artery stenoses contribute to the evaluation
of hemodynamic significances of particular coronary artery stenoses.