Objectives: High intensity curing lights are recommended almost univer
sally on the basis of immediate curing depth measurements. Although th
is single factor is well documented, the influence of light intensity
on other parameters has not been investigated extensively. Methods: Tw
o restorative systems were examined with two light intensities in rega
rd to four properties; polymerization shrinkage (density method), flex
ural modulus and strength (ISO 4049), hardness profiles after post-cur
e (Vickers), and marginal adaptation in dentine cavities (quantitative
margin analysis). Results: The variation in light intensity did not s
ignificantly affect curing contraction or post-cure hardness profiles
to a depth of 4.5 mm for either resin composite. Significant differenc
es were found in flexural modulus with both restoratives; only one mat
erial demonstrated a light intensity-related influence on flexural str
ength. Marginal gap formation increased in each bonding agent/resin co
mposite pair with increased light intensity. Conclusion. In clinically
relevant layer thicknesses, curing a resin composite with a higher in
tensity light may demonstrate significant disadvantages due to increas
ed shrinkage stress.