Epidural analgesia has a well-established role in labour, but has the
drawbacks of delayed onset and motor blockade. The combined spinal-epi
dural technique may overcome these drawbacks. We carried out a randomi
sed observational study to assess maternal satisfaction with the stand
ard and combined techniques among 197 women in labour. For combined sp
inal-epidural analgesia, bupivacaine (2.5 mg) and fentanyl (25 mu g) w
ere initially injected into the subarachnoid space, followed by top-up
s of 15 mL 0.1% bupivacaine with 2 mu g/mL fentanyl into the epidural
space, as required. For standard epidural analgesia, 25 mg (10 mL of 0
.25%) bupivacaine was injected into the epidural space, followed by to
p-ups of 6-10 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, as required. Post partum, each wom
an completed a questionnaire about her labour and scored various items
on a visual analogue scale (0=best, 100=worst outcome). Overall satis
faction was greater in the combined spinal-epidural group than in the
standard epidural group (median [IQR] score 3 [2-10] vs 9 [3-22]; p=0.
0002). Good analgesia was achieved in both groups, but the combined sp
inal-epidural had faster onset of analgesia and more of this group wer
e satisfied with analgesia at 20 min (92/98 vs 68/99, p<0.0001). 12 wo
men in the combined spinal-epidural group had leg weakness (as shown b
y an inability to raise the straight legs) at 20 min, but this initial
motor block had resolved in most of these mothers by 1 h. In the stan
dard epidural group 32 had leg weakness at 20 min (p=0.001), and the p
roportion of mothers with weakness increased in this group during labo
ur. There were no differences in side-effects, except for mild pruritu
s, which was more common in the combined spinal-epidural group (42 vs
1%; p<0.0001). Overall, women seem to prefer the low-dose combined spi
nal-epidural technique to standard epidurals, perhaps because of the f
aster onset, less motor block, and feelings of greater self-control.