1. Recent changes in agricultural policies have reduced the extent of
cultivated farmland. This has provided opportunities to restore heathl
and vegetation on lowland sites where it once occurred. 2. Between Dec
ember 1988 and April 1990 large-scale replicated experiments were esta
blished on abandoned farmland in southern Britain to compare the effec
tiveness of four treatments for heathland restoration: (i) the applica
tion of herbicide; (ii) the addition of harvested heather shoots; (iii
) the addition of heathland topsoil; and (iv) the translocation of hea
thland turves. 3. The number of seedlings of heathland plant species o
n each treatment was counted in December 1990 and 1991, and the shoot
frequency of these species was recorded in January 1993. 4. The grassl
and soil had a significantly higher pH and contained greater concentra
tions of extractable phosphorus and exchangeable calcium than that of
the adjacent heathland. Despite this, the controls showed that there w
as some natural regeneration of heathers within the grassland. 5. Herb
icide treatment inhibited the regeneration of heathland plants. Cultiv
ation followed by the application of harvested heather shoots increase
d the number of seedlings of heathland plant species, but some key spe
cies were missing. All the components of the heathland plant community
occurred in greater numbers on the plots where heathland topsoil had
been applied, and on the parts of transferred heathland turves which h
ad died from drought. 6. The large-scale translocation of heathland tu
rf appeared to be feasible and instantly recreated the mature heathlan
d plant community. However, some changes in the plant community occurr
ed which probably resulted from differences in soil drainage character
istics between the donor and recipient sites. Of the different sources
of heathland plant propagules, harvested heather shoots were a renewa
ble resource, whereas the collection of heathland topsoil and turves i
nvolved the destruction of existing heathland.