R. Soussignan et B. Schaal, FORMS AND SOCIAL SIGNAL VALUE OF SMILES ASSOCIATED WITH PLEASANT AND UNPLEASANT SENSORY EXPERIENCE, Ethology, 102(12), 1996, pp. 1020-1041
Episodes of facial displays involving the zygomatic action (AU12: lip
corner pulling or smiling) were selected from a large sample of childr
en (n = 95) exposed to pleasant and unpleasant odours in the presence
of an unfamiliar person in order to investigate potential differences
in morphological, temporal patterning and social signal value of smili
ng. In a first experiment using the facial action coding system (FACS:
EKMAN & FRIESEN 1978), a considerable morphological flexibility of sm
ites was observed in relation to the subjects' hedonic experience. The
facial configurations of smiling smiling were formed by a number of a
ctions in the upper (AU 4: brow lowering), middle (AU 9: nose wrinklin
g) and lower face (AU 14: dimpling AU 15: lip corner depressing, AU 17
: chin raising, AU 23: lip tightening) and the mouth was more often 'c
losed' in response to unpleasant odours. When exposed to pleasant odou
rs, zygomatic action co-occurred more frequently with an opening of th
e mouth (AUs 25, 26, 27) or with a raising of the cheeks (AU 6). An an
alysis of the temporal patterning of zygomatic actions showed that the
y occurred more rapidly, dropped off the face less abruptly with a ste
pped decrease, were less smooth, and were often associated with shorte
r gazes directed toward the examiner in response only to unpleasant od
ours. These findings suggested that a number of subjects might exert s
ome control on their smiling while confronted with a presumed social c
onstraint, namely the smelling of unpleasant odours in the presence of
an unfamiliar person. In a second experiment, the communicative value
of smiling was investigated in a real-time projection of 10 variants
of smiling to a panel of receives (n = 52). The Duchenne smile (AU 6 12 + 25) and smile with lips opening (12 + 25) provided more accurate
information about the hedonic valence of the inhaled odour than did t
he other types of smiling. In contrast, the perceived valence of the f
acial displays simultaneously combining zygomatic action with muscular
actions of the lower face (AUs 15, 17, 23) appeared more difficult to
discriminate by untrained receivers. It was hypothesized that the sen
ders displayed some forms of smiling possibly to mask their responsive
ness to unpleasant odours in signalling ambiguous or incorrect informa
tion about their internal state to a recipient.