This article describes, compares, and analyzes the roles and functions
of guardianship and several decision-making interventions previously
identified as potential alternatives to guardianship. An analytical fr
amework, comprised of capacity, risk, complexity, and support, is deve
loped to assess performance expectations and identify limitations of f
our types of decision-making interventions. Using case examples to ill
ustrate how the framework applies to practice, the capacity of differe
nt types of interventions to address needs and to substitute or divert
older adults from guardianship is examined. The article concludes wit
h propositions introduced to guide future research.