The conventional wisdom claims that fixed exchange rates provide more
fiscal discipline than do flexible rates, but the recent experience in
Europe, the record of Sub-Saharan countries in the 1980s and the hist
ory of stabilization attempts in Latin America cast empirical doubts o
n this wisdom. We present a standard intertemporal model with perfect
capital mobility and price flexibility in which fiscal policy is endog
enously determined by a maximizing fiscal authority. The model shows t
hat the difference between regimes lies in the intertemporal distribut
ion of the costs of fiscal laxity. Fixed rates push these costs into t
he future, while flexible rates allow the effects of unsound fiscal po
licies to manifest themselves immediately through movements in the exc
hange rate. Which system provides more discipline depends on the autho
rities' discount rate.