COMPARISONS OF 3 INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE DETECTION METHODS FOR THE GERMAN-COCKROACH (DICTYOPTERA, BLATTELLIDAE)

Citation
Me. Scharf et al., COMPARISONS OF 3 INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE DETECTION METHODS FOR THE GERMAN-COCKROACH (DICTYOPTERA, BLATTELLIDAE), Journal of economic entomology, 88(3), 1995, pp. 536-542
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology,Agriculture
ISSN journal
00220493
Volume
88
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
536 - 542
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0493(1995)88:3<536:CO3IRD>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Tarsal exposure is considered the most common route of insecticide upt ake by the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.), in the field. T o monitor resistance, we developed and used a procedure for making top ical applications to the tarsal pads. We also examined the more conven tional topical-thoracic and jar methods of insecticide exposure. Chlor pyrifos and cypermethrin were used to test these exposure methods on o ne susceptible and two resistant strains of the German cockroach. Two statistically based ratios (able to indicate significant differences) were used to compare probit analysis results from these exposure metho ds. First, the resistance ratio (at LD or LT(50) and LD or LT(95)) was used to make comparisons for all three exposure methods. Second, the tarsal-thoracic ratio was used to specifically compare lethal doses (a t LD(50) and LD(95)) from tarsal applications to thoracic applications . An analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure was also used to analyze t hree factors contributing to the production of the resistance ratios. Results of resistance ratio by strain and insecticide showed a rank of tarsal > thoracic > jar for all but three comparisons. Tarsal-thoraci c ratios for cypermethrin indicated no significant differences between tarsal and thoracic LD(50)s and LD(95)s, but did indicate significant differences for chlorpyrifos, Finally, ANOVA of resistance ratios sho wed that the effects of strain had the most variation, followed by bio assay (i.e., exposure method) in the production of resistance ratios i n this study. We discuss the; implications of the resistance ratio, ta rsal-thoracic ratio, and results of ANOVA, its well as tile benefits o f accurately determined body weight bioassays. We emphasize relevant u ses for the tarsal application and statistically based ratio methods, and how our results affect the process of selecting insecticide exposu re methods to be used for monitoring resistance in the German cockroac h.