A series of machine-guarding drawings were developed during the 1940s,
which represent the relationship between gap size and safe distance.
Since the development of these drawings, larger and more comprehensive
anthropometric surveys have been conducted, but they have never been
compared with the drawings. The purpose of this investigation was to d
etermine whether these original recommendations presented in the drawi
ngs are still consistent with data in the larger anthropometric survey
s, especially relating to women and minorities, who are now much more
prevalent in the American workplace. In this study, data from six anth
ropometric surveys were compared with the original machine-guarding re
commendations. To minimize the percentage of the population at risk, t
he length dimensions were chosen from the 99th percentile male populat
ion, and thickness dimensions were chosen from the 1st percentile fema
le population. Many of these recommendations were found to be valid, a
lthough several important modifications were suggested. Several curren
tly recommended dimensions show no correlation to the incompressible j
oints utilized in this study, and it is recommended that they be elimi
nated. The recommendations are presented in tables of maximum gap size
and minimum distance.