Eh. Eylar et al., SUPPRESSED PROLIFERATIVE RESPONSE AND INTERLEUKIN-2 PRODUCTION IN HISPANIC HIV-CELL SUBSETS( AND AIDS T), Cellular and molecular biology, 41, 1995, pp. 25-33
We find that interleukin-2 (IL-2) production is severely depressed (80
-90%) in AIDS T-cells (CD4(+) or CD8(+)) stimulated with anti-CD3 or C
on A together with phorbol eater (PMA) or anti-CD28 coactivation. Like
wise, the proliferative response of CD4(+) T-cells was suppressed, fro
m a mean of 24.6% (HIV+) to 59.1% (AIDS) for PMA with activators OKT3
(anti-CD3), Con A, enteroxin B or pokweed mitogen, and 20.2% (HIV+) to
77.8% (AIDS) with anti-CD28 co-activation. Similar degrees of suppres
sion were found with the CD8(+) T-cells except for a much greater supp
ression at the HIV+ stage with anti-CD28 (57.7%), approximately 2.5 ti
mes higher than for PMA coactivation. However, when proliferation was
induced by the two coactivators combined (PMA plus anti-CD28), much le
ss suppression was observed: 8.5% (HIV+) to 19.0% (AIDS) for CD4(+) ce
lls and 8.2% to 26.5%, respectively, for CD8(+) cells. The data sugges
t that during HIV infection the CD28 pathway becomes most defective, b
ut can be bypassed to some extent by the less-impaired PMA pathway. Th
e IL-2 (+PMA) signal in HIV+ and AIDS cells was also significally less
suppressed suggesting that the disregulation in HIV infection is more
prominent prior to the IL-2 stage of the mitogenic pathway. It is rem
arkable that the CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cells at both the HIV+ and AIDS s
tages generally show the same degree of suppression with all the vario
us activators and coactivators used. These data suggest that the mecha
nism of suppression, whether due to a change in cell phenotype such as
T(H)1 to T(H)2, or from an intrinsic inhibitory mechanism, is similar
and equally expressed in the two T-cell subsets, and independent of t
he factors that lead to CD4(+) T-cell depletion. The data also suggest
that neither viral protein gp 120 nor interleukin-10 (IL-10), which w
ould affect CD4(+) cells preferentially to the CD8(+) cells, appear to
be accountable factors. A putative HIV superantigen is also unlikely
in view of the similar degree of suppression to enterotoxin B as other
activators for AIDS and HIV+ subsets in both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell
s.