J. Huelin et al., A COMPARISON OF HELISAL TM RAPID BLOOD, E LISA, JATROX AND HISTOLOGY FOR HELICOBACTER-PYLORI DIAGNOSIS, Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas, 88(12), 1996, pp. 825-827
Objectives: To assess the usefulness of HELISAL. in the diagnosis of H
elicobacter pylori infection by comparing it with ELISA, JATROX and hi
stopathologic findings. Experimental design: Randomized prospective st
udy. Patients: Sixty-one patients, thirty-three males and twenty-eight
females, 18-73 years old, submitted to esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Re
sults: The sensitivity of HELISAL when compared to ELISA test was 60.8
%, the specificity 73.3%, the positive predictive value 87.5%, the neg
ative predictive value 37.9%, and the kappa index 0.26. When compared
to histopathologic test: sensitivity 60.9%, specificity 65%, positive
predictive value 78.1%, negative predictive Value 44.7%, kappa 0.28. W
hen compared to JATROX, sensitivity 57.7%, specificity 62.5%, positive
predictive Value 81.2%, negative predictive value 34.4%, kappa 0.21.
Conclusion: The sensitivity of HELISAL test is lower than that of othe
r compared tests, and the negative predictive value is very low. The s
pecificity and the positive predictive value are higher than the sensi
tivity. The kappa index shows a very low concordance.