Fdt. Smith et al., SIGNIFICANCE OF INSENSITIVITY OF SCLEROTINIA MINOR TO IPRODIONE IN CONTROL OF SCLEROTINIA BLIGHT OF PEANUT, Plant disease, 79(5), 1995, pp. 517-523
Four hundred isolates of Sclerotinia minor were obtained from diseased
peanut plants (Arachis hypogaea) in field plots untreated or treated
three times with iprodione (1.12 kg/ha) in 1987. On glucose-yeast extr
act agar containing iprodione at 2 mu g/ml, only 6% of the isolates gr
ew. These isolates produced more mycelial growth than corresponding is
olates not previously exposed to the fungicide in agar, indicating tha
t insensitivity developed in vitro. In field microplots artificially i
nfested with sclerotia of the insensitive isolates and planted to pean
ut for 7 yr, iprodione provided significant disease suppression even t
hough insensitive isolates could still be recovered. In a separate 3-y
r microplot study, the pathogenicity of an isolate (B-83-T2) of S. min
or suspected of possessing field resistance to dicarboximide fungicide
s was compared to a sensitive isolate (S-2) after treatment of peanuts
with dicarboximide fungicides (iprodione or vinclozolin), aromatic hy
drocarbon fungicides (dicloran or pentachloronitrobenzene [PCNB]), and
an experimental fungicide (fluazinam). Without fungicide treatment, d
isease incidence (stem lesions per microplot) at harvest averaged 19.9
in plots infested with isolate S-2 and 18.3 in plots infested with is
olate B-83-T2 (no statistical difference), but yields were significant
ly lower (10%) in microplots infested with isolate S-2. When averaged
across isolates, disease incidence was suppressed 96, 63, 42, 41, and
20% by fluazinam, vinclozolin, iprodione, PCNB, and dicloran, respecti
vely. Insensitivity in S. minor to the dicarboximide fungicides appear
s low but persistent and does not pose a threat to the continued use o
f dicarboximides or related fungicides in peanut production.