The unprecedented municipal corruption scandals that occurred in Oslo
in 1989-91 illustrate the contrasts and interrelationships between pub
licly-perceived scandal and actual corruption. What was depicted at th
e time as massive corruption has resulted in no convictions of politic
ians; on close examination the corrupt behavior appears to have been l
imited in both significance and scope, though official reports do sugg
est the possibility that more serious wrongdoing may have occurred. Th
e case illustrates not only the mechanisms by which scandal is propaga
ted, but also the contrasts between legalistic and other definitions o
f corruption. Analysis of four possible categories of corrupt behavior
shows the difficulties of applying legalistic definitions to actual p
ractice, and offers a clearer understanding of how corruption and scan
dal can diverge so sharply.