Jj. Brosens et al., ENDOVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ADENOMYOSIS UTERI - IDENTIFYING THE PREDICTIVE CHARACTERISTICS, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 102(6), 1995, pp. 471-474
Objective To evaluate prospectively the role of endovaginal ultrasonog
raphy in the diagnosis of adenomyosis and to identify predictive chara
cteristics. Setting In Vitro Fertilisation Unit, Hammersmith Hospital.
Subjects Fifty-six women with menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea. Design En
dovaginal sonography was performed and uterine body morphometry and my
ometrial echogenicity were assessed. The sonographic suspicion of aden
omyosis was scored high or low depending on the degree of uterine enla
rgement, uterine asymmetry not due to fibroids and heterogenicity of m
yometrial echoes. The sonographic diagnosis was compared either with t
he histological findings after hysterectomy (n=34) or to the appearanc
es on magnetic resonance imaging (n=22). Results Adenomyosis was diagn
osed in 28 patients: 15 by histology and 13 by magnetic resonance imag
ing. Endovaginal ultrasound demonstrated a sensitivity of 86%, a speci
ficity of 50%, a positive predictive value of 86%, and a negative pred
ictive value of 77%. Uterine morphometry alone did not predict adenomy
osis: although the mean length of the longitudinal, anteroposterior an
d transverse axis was larger in uteri with, compared with those withou
t, adenomyosis, this did not reach statistical significance. The uteri
ne asymmetry ratio was 1.43 (SD 0.6) and 1.34 (SD 0.4) (P=0.26) in ute
ri with and without adenomyosis, respectively, but in the presence of
adenomyosis the mean posterior wall was significantly thicker than the
mean anterior wall: 25.6 (SD 6.6) mm compared with 21.8 (SD 5.0) mm,
P=0.02. Therefore, adenomyosis was best predicted on the basis of ill-
defined myometrial heterogeneity. However, leiomyomas and various echo
genic shadows and artefacts often complicate subjective assessment of
the myometrial echogenicity. Conclusion Endovaginal sonography in symp
tomatic patients can be a sensitive but not a specific procedure for t
he diagnosis of adenomyosis.