THE IMPORTANCE OF CHEST RADIOGRAPHY FOR PUBLIC-HEALTH SINCE 1896

Authors
Citation
Kg. Hering, THE IMPORTANCE OF CHEST RADIOGRAPHY FOR PUBLIC-HEALTH SINCE 1896, Radiologe, 35(5), 1995, pp. 316-324
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
0033832X
Volume
35
Issue
5
Year of publication
1995
Pages
316 - 324
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-832X(1995)35:5<316:TIOCRF>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Without imaging procedures a variety of chest diseases cannot be diagn osed sufficiently. Examples are acute and chronic pneumonia, toxic eff ects on the bronchial and alveolar system, immunologic and malignant c hanges and cardiovascular disease involving the lung. Especially impor tant are the types of disease that attack large sections of a populati on, because a fath of infection may be hidden or because of short- or long-term exposure to relevant concentrations of toxic or allergic age nts - not necessarily recogniced as such - at work, in the general env ironment or associated with certain types of behaviour or illness. All this may have effects on biostatistical and socioeconomic data. Consi dering available epidemiologic data on morbidity and mortality, then p ulmonary tuberculosis, unspecific pneumonias, drug-induced and AIDS-as sociated lung disease, pneumoconioses (silicosis and asbestosis) and p rimary and secondary chest malignancies have to be included in this ca tegory. Conventional chest radiography with high-kV technique and mode rn film-screen combinations continues to be the imaging modality for i nitial evaluation of chest disease worldwide. Low radiation exposure, low cost and overall availability are major advantages. Conventional t omography, however, has nowadays been largely replaced by CT, though a few special indications remain. High-resolution CT (HRCT) and the spi ral technique bring additional benefits. Periodic radiographic mass sc reening of populations with certain disease prevalence still seems fea sible, taking risk assessment, cost effectiveness and radiation exposu re into account. The benefits of appropriate radiological examination are very high: not only for the individual, but, in many instances, al so for the population at large, especially when early detection might prevent further spread of infection or when latent disease is detected at an early stage. In the light the risk of damage due to radiation e xposure seems quite negligible.