Sr. Marianipedroso et al., DISSIMILARITY BETWEEN PROSTAGLANDIN E(1) AND NITRIC-OXIDE DONORS AS POTENTIATORS OF PLASMA EXUDATION IN THE RABBIT SKIN IN-VIVO, Prostaglandins, leukotrienes and essential fatty acids, 52(6), 1995, pp. 399-402
The ability of prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)) and nitric oxide (NO) donor
compounds such as sodium nitroprusside (SNP), glyceryl trinitrate (GT
N), and 3-morpholino-sydnonimine (SIN-1) to modulate the histamine- an
d bradykinin-induced increase in microvascular permeability have been
investigated in rabbit skin, The effect of the NO synthesis inhibitor
N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) on the plasma exudation
induced by histamine and bradykinin was also studied. Local edema for
mation was evaluated using [I-125]human serum albumin, New Zealand whi
te rabbits received an intravenous injection of [I-125]human albumin f
ollowed immediately by the intradermal injection of edematogenic agent
s into the shaved dorsolateral skin. PGE(1) (0.1 nmol/site) significan
tly potentiated both histamine- and bradykinin-induced edema. In contr
ast, SNP (0.4-400 nmol/site), SIN-1 (0.4-400 nmol/site), and GTN (0.4-
40 nmol/site) did not affect the edematogenic response induced by eith
er histamine or bradykinin. GTN (0.4-40 nmol/site) also had no effect
on the increase in plasma exudation induced by histamine and bradykini
n in the presence of PGE(1). L-NAME (50-400 nmol/site), but not its en
antiomer D-NAME, dose-dependently reduced the edema formation induced
by a combination of either histamine or bradykinin with PGE(1). This i
nhibition was significantly reversed by SNP (4-400 nmol/site) and by h
igh doses (2.5 mu mol/site) of L-arginine (but not by D-arginine). Our
results thus demonstrate that PGE(1), but not nitrovasodilators, can
actually potentiate histamine- and bradykinin-induced edema in rabbit
skin. This discrepancy cannot be explained by the lack of vasodilator
activity of the nitrovasodilators since these were able to reverse the
L-NAME-induced inhibition of the edema provoked by histamine. Rather,
this difference most likely reflects the ability of PGE(1) to modulat
e vascular permeability by mechanism(s) other than an increase in arte
rial flow.