STUDIES ON THE MONOAMINE-OXIDASE (MAO)-CATALYZED OXIDATION OF PHENYL-SUBSTITUTED 1-METHYL-4-PHENOXY-1,2,3,6-TETRAHYDROPYRIDINE DERIVATIVES - FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO MAO-A AND MAO-B SELECTIVITY
Yx. Wang et N. Castagnoli, STUDIES ON THE MONOAMINE-OXIDASE (MAO)-CATALYZED OXIDATION OF PHENYL-SUBSTITUTED 1-METHYL-4-PHENOXY-1,2,3,6-TETRAHYDROPYRIDINE DERIVATIVES - FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO MAO-A AND MAO-B SELECTIVITY, Journal of medicinal chemistry, 38(11), 1995, pp. 1904-1910
The structural parameters responsible for the substrate and inhibitor
selectivities of the monoamine oxidases (MAO) A and B remain poorly un
derstood. This situation has improved somewhat with structure-activity
studies that have been performed on nuclear-substituted pargyline der
ivatives and 4-substituted 1-methyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine derivat
ives. The results of these studies suggest that the active site of MAO
-A is sterically more accommodating than the active site of MAO-B. In
the present work we have undertaken a more systematic structure-substr
ate activity analysis with the aid of a series of 4-phenoxytetrahydrop
yridine analogs substituted at the para, meta, and ortho positions of
the phenyl ring with chloro, methoxy, methyl, nitro, and phenyl groups
. All of the compounds proved to be good substrates for both MAO-A and
MAO-B, and all were better MAO-A substrates than MAO-B substrates. Th
e best defined structural parameter relating to selectivity again was
the relative:ly better MAO-A substrate properties of tetrahydropyridin
e derivatives bearing bulky C-4 substituents. Attempts to identify ste
reoelectronic effects related to substrate properties and selectivity
with this series of compounds were not successful. Although some struc
tural correlates with substrate activity can be made, overall the pres
ent state of knowledge is inadequate to provide good descriptors of st
ructural features that characterize MAO-A and MAO-B substrates.