Two experiments, theoretically motivated by the construction-integrati
on model of comprehension (W. Kintsch, 1988), investigated effects of
prior knowledge on learning from high- and low-coherence history texts
. In Experiment 1, participants' comprehension was examined through fr
ee recall, multiple-choice questions, and a keyword sorting task. An a
dvantage was found for the high-coherence text on recall and multiple-
choice questions. However, high-knowledge readers performed better on
the sorting task after reading the low-coherence text. In Experiment 2
, participants' comprehension was examined through open-ended question
s and the sorting task both immediately and after a 1-week delay. Litt
le effect of delay was found, and the previous sorting task results fa
iled to replicate. As predicted, high-knowledge readers performed bett
er on the open-ended questions after reading the low-coherence text. R
eading times from both experiments indicated that the low-coherence te
xt requires more inference processes. These inferences are more likely
to be successful and useful for high-knowledge readers.