RESPONSE-SPECIFIC ANTIESTROGEN RESISTANCE IN A NEWLY CHARACTERIZED MCF-7 HUMAN BREAST-CANCER CELL-LINE RESULTING FROM LONG-TERM EXPOSURE TOTRANS-HYDROXYTAMOXIFEN
Me. Herman et Bs. Katzenellenbogen, RESPONSE-SPECIFIC ANTIESTROGEN RESISTANCE IN A NEWLY CHARACTERIZED MCF-7 HUMAN BREAST-CANCER CELL-LINE RESULTING FROM LONG-TERM EXPOSURE TOTRANS-HYDROXYTAMOXIFEN, Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 59(2), 1996, pp. 121-134
To understand better the antiestrogen-resistant phenotype that frequen
tly develops in breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen, we culture
d MCF-7 breast cancer cells long-term (>1yr) in the presence of the an
tiestrogen trans-hydroxytamoxifen (TOT) to generate a subline refracto
ry to the growth-suppressive effects of TOT. This subline (designated
MCF/TOT) showed growth stimulation, rather than inhibition, with TOT a
nd diminished growth stimulation with estradiol (E(2)), yet remained a
s sensitive as the parental cells to growth suppression by another ant
iestrogen, ICI 164,384. Estrogen receptor (ER) levels were maintained
at 40% of that in parent MCF-7 cells, but MCF/TOT cells failed to show
an increase in progesterone receptor content in response to E(2) or T
OT treatment. In contrast, the MCF/TOT subline behaved like parental c
ells in terms of E(2) and TOT regulation of ER and pS2 expression and
transactivation of a transiently transfected estrogen-responsive gene
construct. DNA sequencing of the hormone binding domain of the ER from
both MCF-7 and MCF/TOT cells confirmed the presence of wild-type ER a
nd exon 5 and exon 7 deletion splice variants, but showed no point mut
ations. Compared to the parental cells, the MCF/TOT subline showed red
uced sensitivity to the growth-suppressive effects of retinoic acid an
d complete resistance to exogenous TGF-beta 1. The altered growth resp
onsiveness of MCF/TOT cells to TOT and TGF-beta 1 was partly to fully
reversible following TOT withdrawal for 16 weeks. Our findings undersc
ore the fact that antiestrogen resistance is response-specific; that l
oss of growth suppression by TOT appears to be due to the acquisition
of weak growth stimulation; and that resistance to TOT does not mean g
lobal resistance to other more pure antiestrogens such as ICI 164,384,
implying that these antiestrogens must act by somewhat different mech
anisms. The association of reduced retinoic acid responsiveness and in
sensitivity to exogenous TGF-beta with antiestrogen growth resistance
in these cells supports the increasing evidence for interrelationships
among cell regulatory pathways utilized by these three growth-suppres
sive agents in breast cancer cells. In addition, our findings indicate
that one mechanism of antiestrogen resistance, as seen in MCF/TOT cel
ls, may involve alterations in growth factor and other hormonal pathwa
ys that affect the ER response pathway. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Sc
ience Ltd.